Just a quick note to say that if you’re bored take a look at http://socialwelfarelaw.wikispaces.com/Housing+Contents+Page

I’ve been trying to update the House’s Handy Links with various bits and pieces. It’s not that complete but might be handy for you and feel free to contribute as it’s only really me that does now.



If you haven’t already, read THIS

Excellent work Mr Torsney and his illegal site.

Mortgage not rescued scheme

House has come across a number of cases recently whereby Housing Association’s are deciding not to purchase properties from clients (who have often been on tenterhooks for months) as the property ‘does not suit their portfolio’.

Such decisions often come with grossly inflated surveys which I can only presume would be carried out by Rolls-Royce driving builders who are partial to gold plating any work done. Such surveys seem to be used to help cherry pick properties whereby, with the help of government funds, the HA might make the most profit / return possible.

One wonders if HA are susceptable to JR for such refusals if founded on jolly unreasonable basis. (is there a plural of basis!?)  

Does anyone else have any experience of this?

Tea Time Teaser

Just a little one for housing bods out there.

If a person accrues arrears on a fixed term tenancy which then expires can a LL rely on those arrears to end a new fixed term tenancy on the same property? Does rent lawfully due only relate to the new tenancy?

Answers on a postcode please.

Hello does anyone know of any caravan sites that accept housing benefit or any organisations that might help a homeless person with a caravan on benefits. House has tried. Have tried Shelter, CAB, CLP but no luck. Wierdly getting less help because client isn’t a gypsy / traveller.



House has an adviser who, rather pleasantly, likes to ask House rather interesting questions. Today this excellent adviser asked something along the lines of ‘If a Court grants a suspended possession order (ie possession in 14 days but suspended on the terms of rent plus x) in regards to a fixed term tenancy then when that fixed term tenancy ends and a new statutory periodic tenancy arises is the order of any effect. Does the order ‘carry over’ to the new statutory periodic tenancy in that if the tenant doesn’t pay their rent can the LL apply for a warrant? Does section 7 (7) help even though the fixed term hadn’t come to an end at the making of the order?

House didn’t really have an answer for said adviser. Any assistance appreciated!

Currently if you receive help with your mortgage payments because you’re on JSA, IS, PC, ESA etc then you the DWP pay as if the interest being charged on your mortgage is 6.08%. This means that regardless of your interest rate 6.08% is what you get.

Because interest rates have been rather low for sometime there are people on tracker or even standard variable rate mortgages who are having more than their interest paid.

Apparently according to the DWP

The current system of mortgage interest support means that 92% of customers get more help than they actually need.

Anyhow’s from 1st October 2010 Unfortunately from October 2010 the rate at which the DWP pay will change to the Bank of England average, currently 3.67%.

Apparently this is  To ensure that Support for Mortgage Interest (SMI) is better targeted

House doesn’t quite understand that but in any event it’s going to cause a lot of pain to a whole lot of subprime borrowers stuck on standard variable or fixed rates which are far higher than the ‘average’ and who do not a lot of chance of re-mortgaging to a better, cheaper lender.

Hrm… the Statutory Instrument’s explanatory notes state that

For that reason it has decided to change the standard interest rate to a rate based on the average interest rate published by the Bank of England for loans to households secured on dwellings on the grounds that this will continue to provide SOME (House’s edit) claimants with protection against repossession at the same time as providing better value for money to the taxpayer and addressing the deficit.
The explanatory note goes on to say that

Under a standard interest rate of around 3.66%, about 50% of support for mortgage interest claimants would continue to have their eligible housing cost met in full by their benefit award. 52% of support for mortgage interest claimantswould have at least 90% of their eligible mortgage interest outgoings covered by their benefit awards and 93% of claimants would have at least 60% of their outgoings covered.

House has done some digging and according to the latest information House could find there are about 220,000 people who receive Support from Mortgage interest. Now if 52% of people have at least 90% of their eligible mortage interest outgoings covered this means that 48 pct or 105,600 wouldn’t. Of these 15400 wouldn’t have even 60 pct of their outgoings covered.
 As those in receipt of SMI are obviously on rather low income then at least those 105,600 are going to be in some serious pain if they don’t get a job or something…

* House isn’t the best at statistics so apologies if any mistakes!

If you are an adviser best warn your clients!

Oh wait never mind the guidance says

The Council of Mortgage Lenders has told us that:

“lenders will continue to exercise forbearance where it is fair to do so for the borrower, and the borrower has a chance of rehabilitation. Although arrears levels may increase for those few borrowers whose new Support for Mortgage Interest payment does not cover their mortgage, this does not translate into an immediate possession risk.”.

What a load of old codswallop. House isn’t  sure how over 100,000 people can be considered a ‘few’.

The CCCS have a press statement here

The SI is here

The average rate can be found in the first tab of Table G.1.4 under the heading “CFM”, column “HSDE” on the Bank of England website (thanks Disability Alliance)

Legal type question!


Please forgive House for being daft but House has a question.

Let’s say a periodic assured shorthold tenant is served with a section 21 notice which is all fine and dandy. Let’s say the last day of the monthly period is the third of each month and the notice say expires on 3rd November and requires possession after that date. Rent is payable on 4th of each month for that month.

Now let’s say that the tenant doesn’t pay their rent on 4th november for november. The tenant moves out on 18th November without telling the Landlord. How much rent is the Landlord entitled to?

1. Are they entitled to rent up until the 18th

2. If the LL tries to recover the whole months rent can the Tenant say well the LL wanted possession after the 4th so that’s what I gave? Would the Tenant have to get the LL to agree to a surrender even though the LL have already indicated they required possession?

Apologies if a silly question!

Yes House knows they are jolly busy but today one department out did themselves by phoning the father of a teenager and saying if you don’t take them back then they’ll be sleeping on the streets as they don’t have to help them!

The excellent Mr Flack has set up a Social Welfare Law wiki. It’s early days but as such things only grow by users contributing House would recommend anyone with an interest in Social Welfare Law at least having a look and joining the wiki if interested in contributing. Sharing good practice, tips, training, links and law can only be a good thing House reckons. House has been working on a Handy Links page so please have a visit.

You can find the Wiki HERE