<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Housed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rehoused.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rehoused.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>A blog about housing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:32:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Inside Housing article by rehoused</title>
		<link>http://rehoused.wordpress.com/2009/10/26/inside-housing-article/#comment-386</link>
		<dc:creator>rehoused</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rehoused.wordpress.com/?p=743#comment-386</guid>
		<description>No problems, glad that this blog isn&#039;t a complete waste of space!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No problems, glad that this blog isn&#8217;t a complete waste of space!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Inside Housing article by NL</title>
		<link>http://rehoused.wordpress.com/2009/10/26/inside-housing-article/#comment-385</link>
		<dc:creator>NL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 10:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rehoused.wordpress.com/?p=743#comment-385</guid>
		<description>You lovely person. You have no idea just how timely your discovery of that London Councils paper was...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You lovely person. You have no idea just how timely your discovery of that London Councils paper was&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Gatekeeping &#8211; Common Local Authority Boll**ks by simplywondered</title>
		<link>http://rehoused.wordpress.com/2009/10/15/gatekeeping-common-local-authority-bollks/#comment-384</link>
		<dc:creator>simplywondered</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 14:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rehoused.wordpress.com/?p=716#comment-384</guid>
		<description>i love the way they are choice-based lettings! (ie fuckall choice)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i love the way they are choice-based lettings! (ie fuckall choice)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Housing Law advice quality guidance by Cait</title>
		<link>http://rehoused.wordpress.com/2009/10/13/housing-law-advice-quality-guidance/#comment-382</link>
		<dc:creator>Cait</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 12:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rehoused.wordpress.com/?p=711#comment-382</guid>
		<description>Was he? 

Oooh credit to him then - as I&#039;ve wafted it around to quite a few people.

Cait</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was he? </p>
<p>Oooh credit to him then &#8211; as I&#8217;ve wafted it around to quite a few people.</p>
<p>Cait</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Gatekeeping &#8211; Common Local Authority Boll**ks by rehoused</title>
		<link>http://rehoused.wordpress.com/2009/10/15/gatekeeping-common-local-authority-bollks/#comment-381</link>
		<dc:creator>rehoused</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 23:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rehoused.wordpress.com/?p=716#comment-381</guid>
		<description>Thanks Nearly

I think 3 was the trickiest to summarise in a few lines. I have found that sometimes Social Services utterly fail to help or even start an assessment so the only thing to do is get the LA&#039;s Homeless Departments to help whilst one tries to bludgeon Social Services into doing what they are paid to do.

Not that they are call Homeless Departments anymore obviously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Nearly</p>
<p>I think 3 was the trickiest to summarise in a few lines. I have found that sometimes Social Services utterly fail to help or even start an assessment so the only thing to do is get the LA&#8217;s Homeless Departments to help whilst one tries to bludgeon Social Services into doing what they are paid to do.</p>
<p>Not that they are call Homeless Departments anymore obviously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Housing Law advice quality guidance by rehoused</title>
		<link>http://rehoused.wordpress.com/2009/10/13/housing-law-advice-quality-guidance/#comment-380</link>
		<dc:creator>rehoused</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 23:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rehoused.wordpress.com/?p=711#comment-380</guid>
		<description>Yup I agree it is useful, must be due to the fact that Mr Flack was part of it :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup I agree it is useful, must be due to the fact that Mr Flack was part of it <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Housing Law advice quality guidance by Nearly Legal</title>
		<link>http://rehoused.wordpress.com/2009/10/13/housing-law-advice-quality-guidance/#comment-379</link>
		<dc:creator>Nearly Legal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 22:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rehoused.wordpress.com/?p=711#comment-379</guid>
		<description>It is actually a good and quite useful document - good practice points abound.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is actually a good and quite useful document &#8211; good practice points abound.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Gatekeeping &#8211; Common Local Authority Boll**ks by Nearly Legal</title>
		<link>http://rehoused.wordpress.com/2009/10/15/gatekeeping-common-local-authority-bollks/#comment-378</link>
		<dc:creator>Nearly Legal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 22:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rehoused.wordpress.com/?p=716#comment-378</guid>
		<description>This is excellent stuff.

Just one small addition on 3. - although a 16/17 year old can decide to to approach social services, anyone who may want &#039;child in need&#039; support - and it is better than just homeless assistance - must make sure/be advised to approach social services. The effect of of G v Southwark is that an approach to the HPU as homeless does not count as an approach to social services by itself. However, housing provided under HA 1996 Part VII will count as accommodation under s.20 Children Act once the approach to social services has been made and need assessed.

16/17 year olds should be advised/assisted accordingly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is excellent stuff.</p>
<p>Just one small addition on 3. &#8211; although a 16/17 year old can decide to to approach social services, anyone who may want &#8216;child in need&#8217; support &#8211; and it is better than just homeless assistance &#8211; must make sure/be advised to approach social services. The effect of of G v Southwark is that an approach to the HPU as homeless does not count as an approach to social services by itself. However, housing provided under HA 1996 Part VII will count as accommodation under s.20 Children Act once the approach to social services has been made and need assessed.</p>
<p>16/17 year olds should be advised/assisted accordingly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Subsidising LSC contracts &#8211; legal? by rehoused</title>
		<link>http://rehoused.wordpress.com/2009/10/05/subsidising-lsc-contracts-legal/#comment-377</link>
		<dc:creator>rehoused</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rehoused.wordpress.com/?p=699#comment-377</guid>
		<description>Thanks Ben, I didn&#039;t know that although it doesn&#039;t suprise me in the least...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Ben, I didn&#8217;t know that although it doesn&#8217;t suprise me in the least&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Subsidising LSC contracts &#8211; legal? by Ben</title>
		<link>http://rehoused.wordpress.com/2009/10/05/subsidising-lsc-contracts-legal/#comment-376</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 10:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rehoused.wordpress.com/?p=699#comment-376</guid>
		<description>Re: paying for your own QM assessments - did you know that they calculate the cost based on numbers of staff? And that they count part-time paid staff as full-time? And that they count volunteers as welll - even if they only do a few hours a week (though they do have the discretion to remit the charges for up to 60% of vols).

So small agencies with, say three FTE posts spread across 7 workers and ten volunteers can be charged as if they have 17 members of staff!

Gggggrrrr...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: paying for your own QM assessments &#8211; did you know that they calculate the cost based on numbers of staff? And that they count part-time paid staff as full-time? And that they count volunteers as welll &#8211; even if they only do a few hours a week (though they do have the discretion to remit the charges for up to 60% of vols).</p>
<p>So small agencies with, say three FTE posts spread across 7 workers and ten volunteers can be charged as if they have 17 members of staff!</p>
<p>Gggggrrrr&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
