Comments on: sec 202 review question http://rehoused.wordpress.com/2009/06/02/sec-202-review-question/ A blog about housing Mon, 14 Dec 2009 18:43:14 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: rehoused http://rehoused.wordpress.com/2009/06/02/sec-202-review-question/#comment-339 rehoused Thu, 04 Jun 2009 21:31:16 +0000 http://rehoused.wordpress.com/?p=618#comment-339 Thanks J Thanks J

]]> By: J http://rehoused.wordpress.com/2009/06/02/sec-202-review-question/#comment-338 J Thu, 04 Jun 2009 20:55:25 +0000 http://rehoused.wordpress.com/?p=618#comment-338 Hammersmith & Fulham v Robinson (I think) is the 17 going on 18 (with apologies to the Sound of Music) case... Hammersmith & Fulham v Robinson (I think) is the 17 going on 18 (with apologies to the Sound of Music) case…

]]> By: rehoused http://rehoused.wordpress.com/2009/06/02/sec-202-review-question/#comment-335 rehoused Wed, 03 Jun 2009 11:20:45 +0000 http://rehoused.wordpress.com/?p=618#comment-335 Ty Nearly I was just thinking about the case with the 17 year old when the LA waited till she turned 18 before making a NP decision. Will have to read that case if I can find it :) Ty Nearly

I was just thinking about the case with the 17 year old when the LA waited till she turned 18 before making a NP decision. Will have to read that case if I can find it :)

]]> By: Nearly Legal http://rehoused.wordpress.com/2009/06/02/sec-202-review-question/#comment-334 Nearly Legal Tue, 02 Jun 2009 23:33:42 +0000 http://rehoused.wordpress.com/?p=618#comment-334 Deficient decision - Reg 8(2) should be triggered - but they will surely be minded to find not homeless on the new facts http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/06/deficiency-in-a-decision/ on reg 8(2) and dodgy 184s. But not sure it will get you very far. Otherwise, I'll have to think... Deficient decision – Reg 8(2) should be triggered – but they will surely be minded to find not homeless on the new facts

http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/06/deficiency-in-a-decision/

on reg 8(2) and dodgy 184s. But not sure it will get you very far.

Otherwise, I’ll have to think…

]]>